While similar in concept, the LectroTreat outperforms vacuum chamber plasma treaters by providing uniform coverage of 3 dimensional parts while minimizing safety, energy, and productivity issues.


Evaluation Factors

Plasma Treaters

Total uniform 360 degree treatment of the three dimensional parts.

Surface Coverage

Total uniform treatment inside and out. Also is used for surface cleaning.

No heat damage to the part being treated. Little or no heat added to the part.

Parts Damage

High heat from inert gas can, over heat parts.

Parallel surface treatment of the part with the electrical discharge, no damage to the part surface.

Overtreatment Potential

Surface Treatment is an impingement of gasses on parts.  Over treatment can oxide the surface and change surface appearance.

No personnel safety hazards with high voltage. Less .001 amps in the electrical discharge.


High frequency power supplies can cause possible interference with electrical/PLC based operations.

Low frequency, 50-60 Hz operation.


High frequency ranges from 40 kHz to 13.56 kHz.

Efficient operation, low power consumption. From 4KW to 14KW.

Power Consumption

Higher power consumption from 40 KW to 50 KW and operational cost with inert gases.

Basically maintenance free, periodic cleaning with a brush.


High maintenance to seals, pumps, and gas fittings.

Continues rates non-batch treating.


Batch process with cycle times up to 15 minutes.

Smaller self-contained unit and can be added onto as production increases.


Much larger space required for vacuum chamber and support equipment.

More Comparisons

Click on the links below to see how LectroTreat compares to other popular surface treating technology across a number of popular factors.

  • Plasma Treating

    Plasma Treating vs. LectroTreat

    Learn More

  • Corona Treating

    Corona Treating vs. LectroTreat

    Learn More

  • Flame Treating

    Flame Treating vs. LectroTreat

    Learn More